Portal
Let's talk
  • What we do
    • Wealth management services
    • Our approach
    • Working together
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Our company
    • Community engagement
    • News and events
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Portal login
  • Disclosures
The latest insights
  • The midterms and your portfolio: what history tells us
  • Separately Managed Accounts: What they are and when they make sense
  • All-time high? Or just another Thursday?

Does Active Management Outperform in Bear Markets?

January 12, 2011
Author: Dougal Williams, CFA

Q:  When the market goes down, index funds will go down right along with it.  Shouldn’t we look to active managers to protect us during a downturn?

A:  It is a common misconception that skilled active investors can anticipate bear markets, and take precautionary actions to prevent losses in a market downturn.  Despite the chatter about active investors’ ability to pick superior stocks in a bear market (e.g., favoring larger, defensive companies in a recession), hold more cash, time the market (buy on dips, sell on tops) or sell stocks short (to profit from price declines) active managers, collectively, have not demonstrated an ability to beat index investors during these periods of market stress.

In 2001, analysts at Schwab’s Center for Investment Research compared the performance record of 120 index funds and 2,100 actively-managed mutual funds.[i] After analyzing these funds’ performance during market declines occurring between December 1986 and March 2001, the researchers concluded:

  • Index funds outperformed actively managed funds in 55% of the down markets.
  • In the worst downturns, defined as declines of 10% or more, index funds outperformed actively managed funds 75% of the time.
  • In the longest downturns, defined as declines of 5 consecutive months or longer, index funds outperformed actively managed funds 100% of the time.

 

In the recent Global Financial Crisis, results were similar.  According to mutual fund database Morningstar, the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index beat more than 60% of actively-managed U.S. stock funds from November 2007 through December 2008.

The implication of this data is clear:  Index funds minimize the risk of having an actively-managed fund turn a bad year into a horrible one.   While it might sound logical and alluring to employ an active manager to “do something” in the face of uncertain markets, the evidence resoundingly supports the efficacy of an index fund approach.


i Schwab Center for Investment Research. “Index or Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds: Which Way to Go In A Down Market,” July 2001.

Dougal Williams, CFA

Connect with Dougal


Article tags
Active vs. passive

Related articles
Investing

The midterms and your portfolio: what history tells us

November 5, 2026By Alex Canellopoulos, CFA, CFP®

Stocks have advanced under Republican, Democratic, and mixed control of Congress. The evidence favors staying invested and diversified over reacting to elections.

Investing

Separately Managed Accounts: What they are and when they make sense

October 19, 2026By Alex Canellopoulos, CFA, CFP®

Separately managed accounts offer direct ownership of individual securities, which can create added tax-management opportunities for investors whose circumstances warrant it.

Investing

All-time high? Or just another Thursday?

September 11, 2026By Joe Rayburn, CFP®

New market highs can feel unsettling, as if stocks can’t climb any higher. But history shows something different. We look at the data, and why staying the course is key.

Subscribe to agenda-free news, tips, and analysis, delivered to your inbox.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Legal Disclosures
  • Form CRS
  • Client Portal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Legal Disclosures
  • Form CRS
  • Client Portal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Legal Disclosures
  • Form CRS
  • Client Portal
  • Cookie Policy
Contact us
© Vista Capital Partners 2026. 100% employee-owned.
Manage Consent

We use cookies to track website performance. View our Privacy Policy for details.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}